More complex deals, more focus on technical aspects/modeling rather than qualitative industry analysis, etc.
]]>Thank you so much!
]]>To have a chance at any of those firms, at least in the U.S./NYC, you have to be at a bulge bracket or elite boutique, have top academic credentials, and get headhunters to vouch for you.
https://mergersandinquisitions.com/how-to-get-into-private-equity/
https://mergersandinquisitions.com/private-equity-recruitment/
This article should help: https://mergersandinquisitions.com/private-equity-recruiting/
]]>Thanks in Advance.
]]>Learn an industry really well, come in with investment ideas, and be able to explain how you could get up to speed quickly on the technical side and learn enough to contribute to deal sourcing and execution.
]]>I am excited and at the same scared of this interview as I want to make best out of this opportunity but I don’t know how to show my interest in this field given the fact that I have no experience in this field and other related fields.
How should I go about preparing for my interview?
Thanks
]]>I think both works to be honest. I’d say it depends on the team – are they willing to give you responsibilities? What projects will you be staffed on? You may want to raise such questions and try to gauge which opportunity allows you to learn more.
]]>I am a consulting engineer, working on due diligence in the Power&Utilities sector. I have just been offered two positions, (1) mid-market investment bank and (2) small private equity firm ($300m of funds) investing in infrastructure (not companies).
At the investment bank I was told that I would have to work a lot on origination.
At private equity firm I was told that my focus would be on financial modelling.
I am unsure which to chose, on the one hand the investment bank is an established company with an history but the idea of working extensively on pitches in power point doesn’t appeal to me. Nevertheless I would do it to get into the industry.
On the other hand the private equity firm does not have a strong name as it has just launched, but the idea of mastering financial modelling seems better than mastering power point.
I would like to gain experience in either of the two and then move to a larger organisation, either IB or PE, in a couple of years. Could you please give me your opinion on which to choose?
Many thanks
]]>